Teaching listening comprehension: Some important aspects for material development and teaching techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v10i2.1499Keywords:
teaching, listening strategies, material developmentAbstract
The paper discusses aspects of spoken language that should be considered in the development of teaching materials, and proposes a few techniques for teaching listening comprehension. It starts with an overview of important characteristics of spoken discourse, which include phonology, accents, prosodic features, speech rate, and discourse structure. It then argues that spoken input varies according to two major distinctions, namely CALP (Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency) and BICS (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) and that efforts should be directed to the former if the materials are intended for academic purposes. It maintains that the materials should incorporate aspects of strategies for listening that help learners overcome comprehension barriers and gain the most from the spoken input. Some principal considerations in grading listening materials are presented according to five parameters, which include linguistic characteristics, explicitness, organization, content and context. Finally, the paper proposes a few teaching techniques that promote strategic listening comprehension for EFL learners of intermediate up to pre-advanced level in an academic setting.
References
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, A. (2013). EFL listeners’ strategy development and listening problems: A process-based study. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 10(3), 81-101.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238
Djiwandono, P. I. (2006). Cooperative listening as a means to promote strategic listening comprehension. English Teaching FORUM, 1(3), 32-37.
Field, J. (2002). The changing face of listening. In Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W.A. (Eds). Methodology in language teaching (pp. 242– 247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2013). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 1 – 24.
Goh, C. C. M. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System 30(2), 185 – 206.
Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learner’s perspectives. System, 34 (2), 165-182.
Hasan, A. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum 13(2), 137 – 153.
Hosseini, F. (2013). Teach how to listen: The effect of listening strategy instruction on documentary video comprehension. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 9, 11-21.
Lam, Y. K. (2002). Raising students’ awareness of the features of real-world listening input. In Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W.A. (Eds). Methodology in language teaching (pp. 248 – 253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2002). Managing vocabulary learning. RELC Portfolio Series 2. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Orta, I. V. (2011). A corpus-based approach to nominalization. In Ferguson, G. R. (Ed). English as a glocalization phenomenon: Observations from a linguistic microcosm. Universitat de Valencia, pp. 137 – 151.
Osada, N. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue, 3, 33 - 66.
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tauroza, S. and Allison, D. (1990). Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics, 11, 90 – 105.
Uribe, D. (2008). Characteristics of academic English in the ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 14(3).
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210.
