Practicum supervisors' insights regarding non-native teachers in training

Authors

  • Enric Llurda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v9i1.1522

Keywords:

practicum supervisor, non-native teachers, TESOL programs

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a series of oral interviews with practicum supervisors in MA TESOL programs, regarding their views on the characteristics and the challenges experienced by non-native teachers in training while they were doing their practice teaching. Practicum supervisors constitute a group of professionals with a unique and privileged perspective onto the classroom performance of both native and non-native student teachers, and through these interviews they can express their concerns and appreciations of non-native student teachers in North-American TESOL programs.

References

Amin, N. (1997). Race and the identity of the non-native ESL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 580-583.
Benke, E., & Medgyes, P. (2005). Differences in teaching behaviour between native and non-native speaker teachers: As seen by the learners. In E. Llurda, (Ed.), Non-native language teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the Profession (pp. 195-215). New York: Springer.
Bernaus, M. (2001). El profesor y el alumno como agentes del proceso de aprendizaje. In L. Nussbaum & M. Bernaus, (Eds.), Didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras en la educación secundaria obligatoria. (pp. 79-113). Madrid: Síntesis.
Berry, R. (1990). The role of language improvement in teacher training: killing two birds with one stone. System, 18, 97-105.
Braine, G. (Ed.) (1999). Non-native educators in English language leaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brutt-Griffler, J., & Samimy, K. K. (2001). Transcending the nativeness paradigm. World Englishes, 20, 99-106.
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Interrogating the “Native Speaker Fallacy”: Non-Linguistic Roots, Non-Pedagogical Results. In G. Braine, (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching. (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Govardhan, A. K., Nayar, B., & Sheorey, R. (1999). Do US MATESOL programs prepare students to teach abroad? TESOL Quarterly, 33, 114-125.
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2005). Mind the gap: Self and perceived native speaker identities of EFL teachers. In E. Llurda, (Ed.), Non-native language teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 265-281). New York: Springer.
Kamhi-Stein, L. (1999). Preparing non-native professionals in TESOL: Implications for teacher education programs. In G. Braine, (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching. (pp. 145-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kamhi-Stein, L. (Ed.) (2004). Learning and teaching from experience. Perspectives on nonnative English-speaking professionals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koike, D. A., & Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. (1999). What is a near-native speaker? Perspectives of job seekers and search committees in Spanish. ADFL Bulletin, 30, 54-62.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2002). University students' perceptions of native and non-native speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness, 11, 132-142.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J.M. (2005). What do students think about the pros and cons of having a native speaker teacher?. In E. Llurda, (Ed.), Non-native language teachers perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 217-241). New York: Springer.
Liu, J. (1999). From their own perspectives: The impact of non-native ESL professionals on their students. In G. Braine, (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching. (pp. 159-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liu, J. (2005). Chinese graduate teaching assistants teaching freshman composition to native English speaking students. In E. Llurda, (Ed.), Non-native language teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 155-177). New York: Springer.
Llurda, E. (2005a). Non-native language teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession. New York: Springer.
Llurda, E. (2005b). Non-native TESOL students as
seen by practicum supervisors. In E. Llurda, (Ed.), Non-native language
teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the Profession (pp. 131-154). New York: Springer.
Llurda, E., & Huguet, A. (2003). Self-awareness in NNS EFL primary and secondary school teachers. Language awareness, 12, 220-233.
Mahboob, A. (2003). Status of non-native English speaking teachers in the United States. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Medgyes, P. (1994). The Non-native teacher. London: Macmillan Publishers. (1999). 2nd edition. Ismaning: Max Hueber Verlag.
Medgyes, P. (1999). Language training: A neglected area in teacher education. In G. Braine, (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching. (pp. 17-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moussu, L. (2002). English as a second language students’ reactions to non-native English speaking teachers. Unpublished MA thesis. Brigham Young University, Utah.
Moussu, L. (2006). Native and nonnative English-speaking English as a second language teachers: Student attitudes, teacher self-perceptions, and intensive English administrator beliefs and practices. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Purdue University. West Lafayette, IN.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pacek, D. (2005). ‘Personality not nationality’: Foreign students’ perceptions of a non-native speaker lecturer of English at a British university. In E. Llurda, (Ed.), Non-native language teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the Profession (pp. 243-262). New York: Springer.
Reves, T., & P. Medgyes (1994). The non-native English speaking EFL/ESL teacher’s self-image: an international survey. System, 22, 353-367.
Seidlhofer, B. (1996). “It is an undulating feeling…” The importance of being a non-native teacher of English. Views (Vienna English Working Papers), 5, 63-79.
Turnbull, M. (2006). Review on Llurda, E. (Ed.) Non-native language teachers. Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the Profession. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 649-651.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-31
Abstract views: 11 | PDF downloads: 9