Development in L2 writing after a semester of study in an Australian university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v3i2.1583Keywords:
English medium university, writing test scripts, linguistic fluency, linguistic accuracy, linguistic complexity, explicit language instructionAbstract
There is a common expectation, particularly amongst international students, that studying in an English-medium university would lead to an improvement in their writing skills (as well as other language skills). However, to date there has been very little research about the impact of studying in an English medium university on the development of learners’ writing. This paper reports on study which was part of a larger project. The larger project, using a test-re-test design, investigated whether the reading and writing skills of international students improved after one semester of study in an Australian university. The study reported here analysed the writing test scripts of 20 students whose global writing scores indicated improvement in writing and who had not accessed any language support during the semester. A range of quantitative and qualitative measures were used to analyse the data, including measures of linguistic fluency, accuracy and complexity. The study found that the greatest improvements occurred in how learners structured their writing and developed their ideas. There was also a marked improvement in the formality of learners’ language, but less evidence of improvement in language accuracy and complexity. These findings suggest that some aspects of written language may need more explicit language instruction in order to improve.
References
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K. & James, M. 2005. Differences in writing discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10, 5-43.
Elder, C. & O’Loughlin, K. 2003. Investigating the relationship between intensive EAP training and band score gains on IELTS. IELTS Research Reports, 4 (pp. 207-254). Canberra: IELTS Australia.
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. 2005. Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferris, D. 2003. Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. 1999. The influence of sources of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3/3, 215-247.
Green, A. & Weir, C. 2003. Monitoring score gain on the IELTS Academic Writing module in EAP Programmes of varying duration. Phase 2 report, Cambridge: UCLES.
Hinkel, E. 2003. Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37/2, 275-301.
Hunt, K. 1966. Recent measures in syntactic development. Elementary English, 43, 732-139.
Krashen, S. D. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Polio, C. 1997. Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47/1, 101-143.
Read, J. & Hays, B. 2003. The impact of the IELTS test on preparation for academic study in New Zealand. IELTS Research Reports, 5 (pp. 237-262). Canberra: IELTS Australia.
Richards, J. C. Platt, J., & Platt, H. 1992. Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Essex: Longman
Shaw, P. & Liu, E. T-K. 1998. What develops in the development of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 19/2, 225-254.
Storch, N. & Hill, K. (under review). What happens to international students’ English after one semester at university?
Storch, N. & Tapper, J. 2000. Discipline specific academic writing: What content teachers comment on. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 /3, 337-356.
Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. 1991. Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximise second language learning. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith, & M. Swain (Eds). Foreign/second language pedagogy research. A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Swales, J. 1985. Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon.
Wolf-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
