Conducting action research in Indonesia: Illustrations and implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v2i1.1611Keywords:
action research, Indonesian contextAbstract
In this article we discuss some of the key features of action research (AR) and how it can be applied in the educational context. We then describe how principles of AR were used in the Indonesian context with ten high school teachers as a professional development experience to encourage the teachers to reflect on their teaching and to introduce changes into their classroom practices. The teachers reported that, in contrast to previous professional development, AR provided them with a powerful means of professional growth as it was closely related to their own teaching situations. It also created changes and innovations in their teaching practices that they believed led to more effective classroom activities and teacher-student interactions. Nevertheless, they also reported various difficulties associated with undertaking research in the classroom. We conclude the article by presenting a case study to illustrate in more detail how AR was conducted by one of the teachers and what changes occurred in her teaching. The article also draws out implications of the study for teacher education in Indonesia.
References
Burns, A. 1999. Collaborative action research for english language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. 2005a. Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 32/2, 57-74.
Burns, A. 2005b. Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crookes, G. 1993. Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14/2, 130-144.
Elliott, J. 1991. Action research: for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Freeman, D. 1998. Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. New York: Heinle and Heinle.
Goswami, D. & Stillman, P.R. 1987. Reclaiming the classroom. Teacher research as an agency for change. Portsmouth, NH.: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
Hopkins, D. 1993. A teacher's guide to classroom research. (2nd ed.) Milton Keynes: Open University.
Isakson, M.B. & Boody, R.M. 1993. Hard questions about teacher research. In L. Patterson, C.M. Santa, K. G. Short & K. Smith (Eds.), Teachers and researchers: Reflection and action. Newark, DL.: International Reading Association.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). 1988. The action research planner. Deakin University, (3rd ed.) Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Markee, N. 1997. Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKay, S. L. 2005. Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McKernan, J. 1996. Curriculum action research. (2nd ed.) London: Kogan Page.
Murphy, D. 1996 The evaluator's apprentices. Learning to do evaluation. Evaluation 2/3, 321-338.
Nunan, D. 1990. Action research in the language classroom. In J.C Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. & Farrell, T. 2005. Professional development for language teachers. Strategies for teacher learning. New York Cambridge University Press.
Rochsantiningsih, D. 2005. Enhancing professional development of Indonesian high school teachers through action research. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Somekh, B. 1994. Inhabiting each other's castles: Towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration. Educational action research 2/3, 357-381.
Wallace, M. 1998. Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the language curriculum. Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
Zeichner, K.M. & Liston, D.P. 1996. Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
